Layers of protection analysis to achieve safety integrity level (SIL), Case study: Hydrogen unit of refinery
Keywords:Risk assessment, Hazard and operability study (HAZOP), Layers of protection analysis (LOPA), Safety integrity level (SIL), Hydrogen unit of refinery
To identify and evaluate hazard in process industries as oil and gas, there are various methods in which hazard and operability study (HAZOP) and layers of protection analysis (LOPA) are the most common methods. The present study aims to analyze layers of protection to achieve safety integrity level in hydrogen unit of refinery. After performing library studies and data collection of events in refinery, hazards of hydrogen unit as operating nodes and deviations with causes and consequences are identified using HAZOP method. The next stage is presenting corrective solutions by LOPA method and target factor. Then, frequencies are determined for the initiating event by the experts. By completing the sheets of each event, independent layers of protection and integrity level are determined. The results of evaluation of identified risks showed that 11 cases had risk higher than 15 and it is not acceptable. The analysis of consequence of hazards showed that for 6 hazardous points, independent layers of protection can reduce risk as 100% to target factor (10-5) and safety integrity level is fulfilled. Regarding the eighths scenario “elimination of repulsive system of equipment and lines with the high temperature of very hot steam”, layers of protection cannot increase safety integrity level to more than 60% (10-3) and to provide safety to target factor, after eliminating the identified problems, other layers are positioned. In this study, to achieve safety integrity level in hydrogen unit of refiner. A three period plan (short-term, mid-term and long-term) is proposed.
Alizadeh, S.S., Moshashaei, P., 2015. The Bowtie method in safety management system: A literature review. Sci. J. Rev., 4(9), 133-138.
Alizadeh, S.S., Sheikh Damanab, P., Rasoulzadeh, Y., Moshashaie, P., Varmazyar, S., 2015. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) technique: A literature review. Sci. J. Rev., 4(1), 1-6.
Berg, A.R., 2007. Applicability of layer of protection analysis to determine safety integrity levels in the process industry: Norw. Univ. Sci. Technol., 1002.
Bridges, W., Dowell, III.A., Gollin, M., Greenfield, W., Poulsen, J., Turetzky, W., 2001. Layer of Protection analysis: Simplified process risk assessment center for chemical process safety. AIChE, New York, NY. 1002.
Cameron, I.T., Raman, R., 2005. Process systems risk management Elsevier. San Diego, 1008.
Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Guadix, J., Onieva, L., 2015. Risk assessment of maintenance operations: The analysis of performing task and accident mechanism. Int. J. Inj. Contr. Saf. Promot., 1028; 11(1), 122-22.
Chongguang, W., Zhang Beike, M.X., 2007. The Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) in Process Industry [J]. Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry. 1002; 40001.
Craddock, H., 1997. Safety hand in hand with quality. Quality World, 11, 25885-20.
Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J.A., Arnaldos, J., 2010. Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. J. Hazard. Mater., 1020; 221(2), 29.
Freeman, R., 2007. Using layer of protection analysis to define safety integrity level requirements. Proc. Saf. Progr. 1002; 12(1), 258-94.
Guo, H-t., Yang, X-h., 2006. Safety integrity level of safety related system and its selection. Contr. Instrum. Chem. Indust. 1002; 11(1), 22.
Habibi, E., Zare, S., Keshavarzi, M., Mousavi, M., Yousefi, H.A., 2013. The application of the Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) in sour water refinery process. Int. J. Environ. Health. Eng. 1021; 1(2), 45-82.
Hasheminejad, N., Halvani, G.H., Moghadasi, M., Zolali, F., Shafizade Bafghi, M., 2012. Risk assessment and determine safety performance indices in design stage and agglomeration project in 2011. Sci. J. Med., 4(4), 63-74.
Isimite, J., Rubini, P.A., 2016. Dynamic HAZOP case study using the Texas city refinery explosion. J. Loss. Prev. Proc. Indust. 1022; 400492-802.
Jafari, M., Lajevardi, S., Mohammad-Fam, I., 2015. Semi quantitative risk assessment of a hydrogen production unit. Int. J. Occup. Hyg. 1028; 8(1), 202-5.
Jarvis, J., 1997. Occupational health and safety: Take the first step. Quality World. 2992; 11(2), 884-2.
Kjellén, U., 2000. Prevention of accidents through experience feedback. CRC Press; 1000.
Lees, F., Loss, 2012. Loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1021.
MARSH., 2002. The 200 Largest Losses 2921-1002: Large property damage losses in the Hydrocarbon Industry. 1001.
Mearns, K., Whitaker, S.M., Flin, R., 2001. Benchmarking safety climate in hazardous environments. A longitudinal, interorganizational approach. Risk analysis. 1002; 12(4), 222-52.
Millner, N., Small, T., 2006. Deakin Crick R. Learning by accident 1002.
Nassir, P., Alizadeh, S.S., Golbabaei, F., Shahtaheri, S.J.A.D., 2007. Hazards identification and assessment in a production factory using Job Safety Analysis (JSA). J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 8(4).
Ouazraoui, N., Nait-Said, R., Bourareche, M., Sellami, I., 2013. Layers of protection analysis in the framework of possibility theory. J. Hazard. Mater. 1021; 1210225.
Rasoulzadeh, Y., Alizadeh, S.S., Valizadeh, S., 2015. Health, safety and ergonomically risk assessment of mechanicians using job safety analysis (JSA) technique in an Iran city. India. J. Sci. Technol., 8(28).
Rausand, M., 2013. Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications. John Wiley and Sons; 1021.
Summers, A.E., 2003. Introduction to layers of protection analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 1001; 204(2), 221-5.
Wei, C., Rogers, W.J., Mannan, M.S., 2008. Layer of protection analysis for reactive chemical risk assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 1005; 289(2), 29-14.
Yi, K.H., Lee, S.S., 2016. A policy intervention study to identify high-risk groups to prevent the industrial accident in South Korea. Safety and Health at Work. 1022.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Akram Delavar, Mahnaz Mirza Ebrahim Tehrani, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.