Study of people’s logical punishment in French law

Authors

  • R. Parvin Department of Law, Kermanshah Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
  • M. Hariri Department of Law, Kermanshah Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
  • K. Mohammadi Department of Arabic, Kermanshah Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

Keywords:

logical persons, the identity of logical personality, punishment duty, the region of punishment, legislative people’s punishment duty, general law, the guarantee of operation

Abstract

The responsibility of punishment is the border of crime and punishment. It is one’s duty, necessity and option in the conclusion of punishment. The responsibility of punishment among legislators is subjective in French law. Regarding articles 2-121 of new, French crime law, legislative people (other than those of government) are responsible for people’s crimes, then they are not deprived. The new, crime law of criminology instruction originate from novice neoclassism, social, novice movement, their effects are visible in criminology. Furthermore, the organ of punishment crime tries to save those who have hurt especially in mortal events. Meanwhile, the principle of common sense is against the legislative reference which is visible in the people’s punishment.

References

Ashoori, M., 1976. Payment of punishment in some of damage by government article 1976, 11 federal Germany. j. polit. sci., n. 20.

Ashoori, M., 1979. Punishment fair in Hamoorabi, Punishment fair in Hamoorabi’s view comparative law faculty. Tehran univ. press., n. 7.

Amende, B,M., 1993. Confiscation, Afficage ou Communication de la Decision, Rev. des Sociétés Extrait du N 2.

Boizard. P., Levasseur, S., Bouloc, B., 1993. le domaine de la Responsabilité pénale des personnes morales. Rev. des soc., du N° 2 extrait.

Bouloc, B., 1994. Généralités sur les Sanctions Applicables aux Personnes Morales. Et droit penal general Dalloze, paris, 1994.

Cuyon, Y., 1993. Quelles sont les personnes morales de droit privé susceplibles d'en courir une responsabilité pénale. Rev. des societies extrait du N 2.

Desportes, F., 1995. Le Gunehec, F, le nouveau droit pénal, tome 1.

Feiz, A.R., 1984. Comparative in Islamic, punishing law, first vol. Ershad press., p. 232

Imamin, S.H, 1973. civil law, fourth vol. fifth ed. Islamieh press, p. 150

Kanner. M., 1962. le droit simple et complet. Quatrième édition, Paris.

Larguoer, J., 1995. Droit penal Général, 15 ed. Dalloz paris, memento. p.89.

Levasseur., Chavanne, A., Montreuil, J., 1994. Cour Elémentaire de Droit Pénal et Procedure Pénalel l ed. Sirery. 1994.

MarChand, M., 1989. Rapport, Document Mis en Distribution le 3 octobre, tome 1.

Motmmani., Tabatabaee, M., 1994. office law, Samt press, vol. 2.

Pariente, M., 1993. les groupes des societies et la responsabilité pénale des personnes morales, Rev. des societies., extrait du N 2. 1993

Picard, E., 1993. Responsabilité pénale des personnes Morales de Droit public Fondement et Champ d, Application Rev. des Sociétés., extrait du N. 2.

Pradel, J., 1999. Droit pénal général, 12 édition, Cujas.

Safarian, M.J, 1990. Legislative personality, Dana press.

Stéfani, G., Bouloc, B., 2008. précis de droit penal, Dalloz. Edition 20°.

Stefani, G., Levasseur, G., Bouloc, B., 2008. précis de Droit penal general, 20° ed. Dalloz.

Published

2014-04-28

How to Cite

Parvin, R. ., Hariri, M. ., & Mohammadi, K. . (2014). Study of people’s logical punishment in French law. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 198-202. Retrieved from http://www.sjournals.com/index.php/sjpas/article/view/915