College mathematics classroom for pre-service teachers: developing students’ ability of communication that promotes deeper learning

Authors

  • Su Liang Department of Mathematics, CSUSB,California State University at San Bernardino, United States

Keywords:

Effective mathematical communication;Deeper learning;Classroom culture

Abstract

This paper reportedthe result of an innovative teaching project in pre-service teacher mathematicsclassrooms. The purpose is to share my experience of building a classroomenvironment of effective communication that not only promotes deeper learningbut also helps students become independent thinker and learner. Some teachingstrategies are discussed.

References

Artzt, A. F., Armour-Thomas, E., 1992. Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving. Cognit. Instruct., 9, 137-175.

Artzt, A.F., Armour-Thomas, E., Curcio, F.R., 2008. Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ball, D. (1991). Wha t ’sallthistalkabout discourse? Arithmetic Teacher., 39 (3),

- 49 .

Chazan, D., Ball , D., 1999. B e yond being told not to tell. Learn. Math., 19 (2), 2 - 10 .

Clark, K.K., Jacobs, J, Pittman, M.E., Borko, H., 2005. Strategies for Building Mathematical Communication in Middle School Classroom: Modeled in Professional Development Implemented in the Classroom. Current Issue in Middle Level Education., 11(2), 1-12.

Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., 1994. Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Gar nier, H., Givvin, K.B., Hollingsworth , H., Jacobs, J. , etal ., 2 003).Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (NCES Publication No. 2003-013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education statistics.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics., 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Research Council (NRC)., 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. J.D., Bransford, A.L., Brown., R.R., Cocking (Eds). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ontario Ministry of Education, C.A., 2010. Communication in Mathematics Classroom, retrieved From http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_Communication_Mathematics.pdf.

Seaman, C.E., Szydlik, J. E., 2007. Mathematical Sophistication among perservice elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education., 10, 167-182.

Smith, J. P., III. 1996. Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. J.Res. Math. Educ., 27 (4), 387-402.

Stigler, J.W., Hiebert, J., 1999. The teaching gap. New Yor k : Fr ee Press.Wichelt, L., 2009. Communication: A Vital Skill of Mathematics. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, [email protected] of Nebraska –Lincoln.

Published

2014-01-29

How to Cite

Liang, S. . (2014). College mathematics classroom for pre-service teachers: developing students’ ability of communication that promotes deeper learning. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(1), 21-25. Retrieved from http://www.sjournals.com/index.php/sjpas/article/view/944

Issue

Section

Education