Bio-efficacy of different antibacterial antibiotic, plant extracts and bioagents against bacterial blight of soybean caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea

Authors

  • G. P. Jagtap Department of Plant Pathology, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani ,Maharashtra, India
  • S. B. Dhopte Department of Plant Pathology, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani ,Maharashtra, India
  • U. Dey Department of Plant Pathology, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani ,Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Bio-efficacy; Fungicides; Plant extracts; Bioagents; Mycelial growth inhibition; Glycine max; Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to study efficacy of different antibacterial antibiotic, plant extracts and bioagents against bacterial blight of soybean caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea. The results revealed that all the five antibiotics tested in vitro applying poisoned food technique against Pseudomonas syringae significantly inhibited the growth of the test pathogen over untreated control. However, antibiotic, Streptocycline + Copper oxychloride recorded minimum mean colony diameter (10.47mm) and maximum mean inhibition (83.65 mm) of growth of the test pathogen over untreated control (mean col. dia. 90.00 mm and mean inhibition, 0.00) followed by the antibiotic Streptocycline 100 ppm (mean col. dia., 15.64 mm and mean inhibition, 76.69%) and Copper oxycloride (mean col. dia., 21.42 mm and mean inhibition, 62.74%). In field, the highest mean per cent disease incidence 35.51 per cent was observed in poushamycin treatment. The lowest mean per cent disease incidence 12.74 per cent was found in treatment streptocycline 100 ppm + Copper oxychloride (@0.25%) and recorded highest seed yield (2605 kg/ha) and test weight (14.33 g). Plant leaf extract (@ 5 and 10%) of Neem recorded lowest mean colony diameter (34.72 mm) and highest mean mycelial growth inhibition (59.26%) of the test pathogen over untreated control followed by Ginger (mean col. dia, 44.42 mm and mean inhibition, 48.55%).

References

Anonymous, 2007. The black rust of cotton. Alab. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 27, 1.

Chattannovar, S.N., Kulkarni, S., Hegde, R.K., 1988. Biological control of Alternaria alternata on leaf blight of

wheat. PL. Pathol. Newslatter. 6 (1-2), 15.

Dennis, C., Webster, J., 1971. Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma II. Production of volatile

antibiotics. Trans. British Mycol. Sac. 57, 41-48.

Godtfredsen, W.O., Vagedal, S., 1965. Trichodermin, a new sesquiterpene antibiotic. Acta Chem. Scandina. 19,

-1102.

Govindappa, Hosgoudar, N., Chattanawar, S.N., 2008. Chemical and biological control of foliar diseases of cotton.

J. cotton Res. Dev. 22 (2), 225-228.

Jeyachandran, K.S., Shanmugam, N., 1979. Studies on chemical control of bacterial blight of cotton. Madras Agric.

J. 66 (4), 270-274.

Lim, S.M., 1992. Bacterial blight of soybean. Plant diseases of international importance volume-II, Diseases of

vegetables and oil seed crops. 305-313.

Meshram, M.K, Raj, SGowade, S.S., Taneja. N.K.,1985. Evaluation of some fungicides and antibiotics for the control

of bacterial blight of cotton. Pesticides, 19 (8), 31-32.

Meshram, M.K., Raj, S., 1992. Effect of bacterial blight infection at different stages of crop growth on intensity and

seed cotton yield under rainfed conditions. Indian J. plant Protec. 20(1), 54-57.

Meshram, M.K., Sheo-Raj,1988. Seed cotton yield and fibre quality as influenced by different grades of bacterial

blight under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Plant Protec.16 (2), 257-260.

Mishra, S.P., Krishna, A., 2001. Assessment of yield losses due to bacterial blight in cotton. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol, 31

(2), 232-233.

Patil, P.V., 2003. Assessment of avoidable yield losses caused by bacterial blight in G. cotton Hy 10 cotton and its

parents. J. cotton Res. Dev. 17(1), 45-47.

Pyke, T.R., Dictz, A., 1960, U-Zh-963, A new antibiotic I. Discovery and biological activity. Appl. Microbio., 14, 506-

Rampand, U.S., 1979. Screening of cotton germplasm against bacterial blight caused by X. campestris pv.

malvacearum. Indian phytopath. 32, 486-487.

Robinson, P.M. and Park, D. 1966. Volatile inhibitor of spore germination produced by Taagi. Trans. British Mycol.

Scoi. 49, 639-649.

Saha, S., Singh, R.P., Verma, J.P., Jayaraman, J., 2000. Population dynamics of cotton phylloplane bacteria

antagonistic towards X. campestris pv. malvacearum. Indian Phytopath., 54 (4) : 409-4013.

Sanjay-Arya A., Parashar, R.D., 2002. Biological control of cotton bacterial blight with phyloplane bacterial

antagonists. Tropical Agri. 79 (1), 51-55.

Sujoy-Saha, Singh, R.P., Verma, J.P., Jayaraman, J., 2000. Plasmid borne determinants of colony morphology,

pigmentation, antibiotic resistance and antibiosis in Pseudomonas spe. 79 (90), 1343-1385.

Taylor, J.D., Dudley, C.L., 1977. Seed treatment for the control of halo blight of beans Pseudomonas phaseolicola .

Ann. Appl. 85, 223-232.

Taylor, J.D., Dye, D.W., 1976. Evaluation of streptomycin seed treatments for the control of bacterial blight of peas.

Pseudomonas pisi Sackett. N.Z.J. Agric. Res. 19, 91-95.

Tereschanko, B.A., 1877. Cotyledon bacteriosis of soybean. Zaschita Restenil. 9, 18-19.

Thind, B.S., Mehra, R.K., 1992. Chemical control of bacterial blight of rice. Plant Disease Res. 7 (2), 226-234.

Published

2012-06-30

How to Cite

P. Jagtap, G., B. Dhopte, S., & Dey, U. . (2012). Bio-efficacy of different antibacterial antibiotic, plant extracts and bioagents against bacterial blight of soybean caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea. Scientific Journal of Microbiology, 1(1), 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.sjournals.com/index.php/sjm/article/view/1425

Issue

Section

Original Article